Notification Service System Design
1. Business Requirements
Functional Requirements
- User registration and authentication (apps, admins)
- Send notifications via multiple channels (email, SMS, push, in-app)
- Support for urgent and scheduled alerts
- Notification templates and personalization
- Delivery status tracking and retries
- Mobile-ready API and dashboard
- Role-based access control
- Analytics and reporting (delivery rates, failures, trends)
- API for programmatic notification requests
Non-Functional Requirements
- 99.9% availability (max ~8.76 hours downtime/year)
- Scalability to handle high notification volume and spikes
- Secure data storage and access control
- Fast response times (<300ms for most API/dashboard requests)
- Audit logging and monitoring
- Backup and disaster recovery
- GDPR/data privacy compliance
- Mobile responsiveness
Out of Scope
- Built-in chat/messaging between users
- Third-party marketing automation integration
- Content moderation for notification payloads
2. Estimation & Back-of-the-Envelope Calculations
- Clients: 10,000 (apps, services)
- Notifications/day: 5M (urgent + scheduled)
- Peak concurrent requests: ~10,000
- Data size:
- Notification logs: 5M × 0.5 KB ≈ 2.5 GB/day
- 1 year: 2.5 GB × 365 ≈ 900 GB
- User/app data: 10,000 × 2 KB ≈ 20 MB
- Templates: 1,000 × 1 KB ≈ 1 MB
- Total DB size: ~1 TB/year (excluding logs, backups)
- Availability:
- 99.9% = 8.76 hours/year downtime max
- Use managed DB, multi-AZ deployment, health checks, auto-scaling
3. High Level Design (Mermaid Diagrams)
Component Diagram
mermaid
flowchart LR
Client[Client (Web/Mobile/App)]
LB[Load Balancer]
API[Notification API]
App[Application Server]
DB[(Metadata DB)]
Queue[Message Queue]
Channel[Channel Workers (Email/SMS/Push)]
Alert[Alert/Notification Service]
Analytics[Analytics Engine]
Client --> LB --> API --> App
App --> DB
App --> Queue
Queue --> Channel
Channel --> Alert
App --> Analytics
Analytics --> DBData Flow Diagram
mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant C as Client
participant A as API Server
participant Q as Queue
participant W as Channel Worker
participant D as DB
participant L as Alert Service
C->>A: Send Notification Request
A->>Q: Enqueue Notification
Q->>W: Dequeue and Process
W->>D: Log Delivery Status
W->>L: Trigger Urgent Alert (if needed)
W-->>A: Delivery Status
A-->>C: ResponseKey Design Decisions
- Database: Relational DB (e.g., PostgreSQL) for metadata, logs, and templates
- Queue: Distributed message queue (e.g., RabbitMQ, Kafka, AWS SQS) for decoupling and scaling
- Channel Workers: Separate workers for each channel (email, SMS, push)
- Alerting: Urgent alerts via dedicated service (e.g., Twilio, Firebase)
- Analytics: Batch or streaming (e.g., Kafka + Spark, or managed cloud analytics)
- Deployment: Cloud-based, multi-AZ, managed services for high availability
- API: REST/GraphQL for programmatic access
4. Conceptual Design
Entities
- User/App: id, name, api_key, contact_info, role, status
- Notification: id, user_id, channel, payload, status, priority, scheduled_at, sent_at
- Template: id, name, content, channel, created_at, updated_at
- DeliveryLog: id, notification_id, channel, status, timestamp, error
- Alert: id, user_id, type (urgent/scheduled), message, created_at, status
- AuditLog: id, user_id, action, entity, entity_id, timestamp
Key Flows
- Notification Sending:
- Client sends notification request
- API enqueues notification
- Channel worker processes and sends via appropriate channel
- Logs delivery status, triggers urgent alert if needed
- Alerts:
- System triggers urgent alerts for failures or high-priority events
- Analytics:
- Periodic jobs aggregate delivery, failure, and trend data
Security
- Role-based access control (RBAC)
- API key validation, input validation, rate limiting
- Encrypted connections (HTTPS)
- Regular backups and audit logs
5. Bottlenecks and Refinement
Potential Bottlenecks
- Queue/message throughput:
- Use scalable, distributed queues and auto-scaling workers
- Channel provider rate limits:
- Implement retry, backoff, and provider failover
- Database contention:
- Use read replicas, caching, and DB connection pooling
- Alert delivery:
- Use async queues for urgent notifications
- Single region failure:
- Deploy across multiple availability zones/regions
Refinement
- Monitor system metrics and auto-scale API servers and workers
- Regularly test failover and backup restores
- Optimize queries and indexes for frequent operations
- Consider sharding if notification/log volume grows significantly
This design provides a scalable, highly available, and mobile-ready notification service with robust urgent alerts, analytics, and operational best practices.