PR/PO Management App System Design
1. Business Requirements
Functional Requirements
- User registration and authentication (employees, managers, finance, admins)
- Create, edit, approve, and track Purchase Requests (PR) and Purchase Orders (PO)
- Workflow management for PR/PO approvals (multi-level)
- Attachments for supporting documents (quotes, invoices)
- Real-time status updates and notifications (urgent alerts for pending/overdue approvals)
- Search and filter PR/POs (by status, department, vendor, date, etc.)
- Role-based access control (requester, approver, finance, admin)
- Audit logging for all actions
- Mobile-ready responsive UI and API
- Analytics and reporting (spending trends, approval times)
Non-Functional Requirements
- 99.9% availability (max ~8.76 hours downtime/year)
- Scalability to support large organizations and high transaction volume
- Secure data storage and access control
- Fast response times (<300ms for most requests)
- Audit logging and monitoring
- Backup and disaster recovery
- GDPR/data privacy compliance
- Mobile responsiveness
Out of Scope
- Integration with external ERP/accounting systems (unless specified)
- Payment processing
- Vendor onboarding/management (unless specified)
2. Estimation & Back-of-the-Envelope Calculations
- Users: 10,000 (employees, managers, finance, admins)
- PR/POs per year: 500,000 (~1,400/day)
- Peak concurrent users: ~1,000
- Data size:
- PR/PO records: 500,000 × 2 KB ≈ 1 GB
- Attachments: 500,000 × 500 KB ≈ 250 GB (object storage)
- User data: 10,000 × 2 KB ≈ 20 MB
- Audit logs: 10M × 0.2 KB ≈ 2 GB
- Total DB size: ~3 GB (excluding logs, backups, attachments)
- Availability:
- 99.9% = 8.76 hours/year downtime max
- Use managed DB, multi-AZ deployment, health checks, auto-scaling
3. High Level Design (Mermaid Diagrams)
Component Diagram
mermaid
flowchart LR
User[User (Web/Mobile)]
LB[Load Balancer]
App[Application Server]
DB[(Database)]
Cache[Cache (Redis)]
Storage[Object Storage (Attachments)]
Alert[Alert/Notification Service]
Analytics[Analytics Engine]
User --> LB --> App
App --> DB
App --> Cache
App --> Storage
App --> Alert
App --> Analytics
Analytics --> DBData Flow Diagram
mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant A as App Server
participant D as Database
participant C as Cache
participant S as Storage
participant L as Alert Service
U->>A: Submit PR/PO
A->>C: Check User/Workflow State
C-->>A: Hit/Miss
A->>D: Create/Update PR/PO Record
D-->>A: Success/Fail
A->>S: Upload Attachment (if any)
S-->>A: Success/Fail
A->>L: Send Urgent Alert (if pending/overdue)
A-->>U: ResponseKey Design Decisions
- Database: Relational DB (e.g., PostgreSQL) for transactional data, strong consistency
- Cache: Redis for fast lookups (sessions, workflow state)
- Object Storage: For attachments (e.g., AWS S3, Azure Blob)
- Alerting/Notifications: Email/SMS/push via third-party service (e.g., Twilio, Firebase)
- Analytics: Batch or streaming (e.g., Kafka + Spark, or managed cloud analytics)
- Deployment: Cloud-based, multi-AZ, managed services for high availability
- API: REST/GraphQL for mobile and web clients
4. Conceptual Design
Entities
- User: id, name, email, password_hash, role, department, registration_date, status
- PurchaseRequest (PR): id, user_id, department, description, amount, status, created_at, updated_at
- PurchaseOrder (PO): id, pr_id, vendor, amount, status, created_at, updated_at
- Attachment: id, pr_id, po_id, url, type, uploaded_by, uploaded_at
- Approval: id, pr_id, po_id, approver_id, status, approved_at, level
- Alert: id, user_id, pr_id, po_id, type (urgent/pending/overdue), message, created_at, status
- AuditLog: id, user_id, action, entity, entity_id, timestamp
Key Flows
- PR/PO Submission:
- User submits PR/PO
- App checks workflow state (cache, then DB)
- Stores PR/PO, uploads attachments
- Triggers urgent alert if pending/overdue
- Approval Workflow:
- Approver reviews PR/PO
- Updates approval status, triggers next step or alert
- Alerts:
- System triggers urgent alerts for pending/overdue approvals
- Analytics:
- Periodic jobs aggregate PR/PO, approval, and spend data
Security
- Role-based access control (RBAC)
- Input validation, rate limiting
- Encrypted connections (HTTPS)
- Regular backups and audit logs
5. Bottlenecks and Refinement
Potential Bottlenecks
- Workflow state contention:
- Use cache for workflow state, DB connection pooling
- Attachment storage/delivery:
- Use scalable object storage and CDN
- Alert delivery:
- Use async queues for urgent notifications
- Database contention:
- Use read replicas, caching, and DB connection pooling
- Single region failure:
- Deploy across multiple availability zones/regions
Refinement
- Monitor system metrics and auto-scale app servers
- Regularly test failover and backup restores
- Optimize queries and indexes for frequent operations
- Consider sharding if user/PR/PO volume grows significantly
This design provides a scalable, highly available, and mobile-ready PR/PO management system with robust urgent alerts, analytics, and operational best practices.